Wherein His Excellency Bishop Giuseppe Furioso, having required that I first kiss his ring, allows me to reprint for the flock here at Majority Rights, a letter with which food producers should be bombarded.  Who knows?  If the Hispanics and Hindus jump on this bandwagon, something like His Excellency’s mark “M” might appear next to the “K” on many food items—with the appropriate fees paid to men like His Excellency…

READ MORE...

So far, then, Britain has been treated to 7/7, 21/7, Bluewater, the Barot offensive, the West End poets and the inflammatory Glasgow doctors.  And let us not forget Richard Reid, the Shoe Bomber.  But yesterday, our Prime Minister’s new head security guard informed us:-

We’re talking about such a big change in the way people behave that it’s inevitably going to take 10 to 15 years, and that’s if we’re lucky, and that’s what I hope we can achieve.

I think it would be wrong to pretend otherwise to the British nation.

He then went on to pretend that the Moslems currently domiciled in my homeland can be got to look beyond the palms of their hands and “snitch” on the AQ-intoxicated.  The real enemy, apparently, is a “disparate core” of “racist” people, often based abroad, who want power.  Elsewhere we learn that “these people are trying to destroy one’s entire way of life.”  And that life is, you know, “our” collective Moslem and non-Moslem MultiCult rainbow-dream thingy:-

Britishness does not normally involve snitching or talking about someone.  I’m afraid, in this situation, anyone who’s got any information should say something because the people we are talking about are trying to destroy our entire way of life.

“We’ll have to be a little bit unBritish, I think . . . and say something and tell something.

So let’s put the pieces together from a majority perspective.

READ MORE...

In our corner of philosophical life I seem to be the only person using this particular six-syllable word to characterise the mind of Man.  Now, that could be because it is a very bad characterisation.  Equally, it could be that I’m very bad at characterising my characterisations.  In the pitiful belief that it must be the latter, I am going to set forth precisely what these six syllables mean, and why they are important.

Readers who wish to live out the rest of their lives in peace and contentment look away NOW.

To the stoics who remain, my commiserations ... and the sincere hope that you will never be the same again.

There are a couple of much-used words - propositions really - that trouble me a lot.  They are, respectively, “freedom” and “will”.  These are the most dangerous ideas in the world.  They are the seat of a political fire that has been eating away at European Man’s existence for the last three hundred and fifty years and, if left unaddressed, will deliver him into a dispossessed, deracinated, dying individualism.  By any past or present measure in the life of Man, what is happening now to the most beautiful and creative of all his peoples is an event of incomprehensible scale.

Only those Europeans who cleave to that something called the radical right have noticed this, it seems.  We complain ceaselessly about it.  We point out that there is no place in the West where our people are not sick with freedom, or sickening fast.  So sick are they, we say, that the very ties of love that bind and bring meaning and beauty to their lives are being loosened with each passing day.  They are pursuing a vision of freedom that has as its method pure vandalism.

But none of it has the impact we desire.  Turning in on ourselves, then, we are haunted by two questions.  We return to them again and again.  How did it come to pass, and why?

READ MORE...

On the Fourth of July, the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence,  “The Ron Paul Phenomenon” takes on added significance.  It brings to a head the original intent of the Founders when they drew a line in the dirt, saying, “This is our land.” and upon that foundation of Independence, said, with the US Constitution, “This is our law.”  These were men ready, willing and able to take up arms for their land and law.  The fireworks displays on the Fourth of July are symbolic of the fact that they did take up arms to enforce their Independence.  Ron Paul, however, is committed to non-violent “civil disobedience” within which people accept the punishment of unjust law after openly violating said law.  Where is Ron Paul’s equivalent “line in the dirt”?  When does he say, “Enough is enough… this government has lost any moral right to demand ‘civil disobedience’ and is now subject to armed rebellion.”?  If it is not when the government sexually tortures idealistic young men in its prisons—preferrentially targetting with sexual torture young white men, the men most likely to be a taxable resource to it, then when, pray Godan, is it that he considers violent opposition legitimate?

That is where we stand today—and it is to those young men Ron Paul must answer when he demands non-violent resistance to government tyranny.

When the flight from the cities becomes widespread, people are going to find themselves renting small plots of land from which they’ll need to scrape some semblance of subsistence.  However they’ll be renting land that has been grabbed by the genocidal land barons, who will be protected by mercenary sheriffs.  Most of these sheriffs will be vampires—whose character has been shaped by compensating, for having to live under the thumb of—and forcing other men to submit to the abuse of—feminist wives, with the sadistic power of sending the “delinquent” young men of their communities off to be raped by gangs of black and Hispanic prisoners and frequently infected with HIV, Hep-C, XDR-TB and drug resistant staph. 

In this desperate situation, being able to generate subsistence from small amounts of low quality land within a short period of time—months if not weeks—will be a crucial bridge for them.  I’m not going to say more here about this except to show you something that vividly illustrates an important potential source of feedstock for fish cultivation: 

One Week Cultivated Algae Bloom

This graphically illustrates the fast growth rate of algae during the course of a single week under the right conditions (the first scene shows the pool before it was fertilized, while the city water chlorine was still dissipating).  The pool and pump is purchased from Walmart for $40.  The algae is a yet-to-be-identified wind-borne species growing in the Pacific Northwest.  It should be noted that algae are copious producers of protein as well as omega-3 oils DHA and EPA—which aquaponics equipment can convert to live fish at a ratio of 1.5 to 1—producing fertilizer for vegetable growth as a side product.  It should also be noted that not only is the doubling time fast, but the percentage of solar energy converted to food calories can’t be beat.

Neocon Nightmare, Ron Paul filled his 1000 seat room to capacity in Des Moines as the other GOP presidential candidates at the “conservative” forum from which Paul was excluded drew just 600 leaving 200 seats empty.

The only thing they can really do now is try to rely on media silence—a task aided immensely by the terrorist attacks across the pond—and the Des Moines Register did everything it could to help the necons there, refusing to mention Paul’s capacity crowd but reporting on the flopped forum of “conservatives” next door…

READ MORE...

The picture emerging tonight of the attempted double bombing in London’s West End looks very like both the Barot and the Bluewater gang plans of attack.  The leader of the Bluewater gang, it should be noted, was never caught.

In any event, I find it strange and interesting that these, of course, deeply religious young men should wish to dismember and incinerate “slags” in a London nighclub - Tiger Tiger, the club in The Haymarket, was running a ladies night when the car-bomb was parked thoughtfully outside and the occupant sprinted away into the night.  According to one BBC report:-

Islamist extremist literature sometimes singles out clubs as examples of the immoral hypocrisy of countries like the UK.

We’ve seen Islamic terrorist attacks on nightclubs before, most notably and unforgettably in 2002 in Bali.  But then it was possible to see this as an economic attack on the Indonesian government as well as a punishment for John Howard’s support of Bush’s War on Terror.  Certainly as regards the former, Islamic terrorists had bombed the Jakarta Stock Exchange attack a full year before 9/11.

The next landmark attack was the double hit in Istanbul in November 2003.  This time there was no question that the targets were political and economic: the British consulate and the HSBC bank headquarters in Istanbul.

Obviously, there is no shortage of potential political or economic targets in London.  There are American targets.  There are Israeli and Jewish diaspore targets.  One would think that the destruction of one or other of these would resonate well enough with the Ummah ... always assuming that the Ummah was moved by revenge attacks for the indignity of Iraq, Afghanistan or Palestine.  But here we have nothing of that sort but, apparently, a third large-scale attack on the decadence of the West.  Why?

READ MORE...

The Senate delivered an apparently fatal blow on Thursday to President George W. Bush’s planned immigration overhaul and dashed the hopes of millions of immigrants seeking legal status.

In a crucial make or break vote that exposed deep lack of support among Bush’s own Republicans, the legislation fell 14 votes short of the 60 votes needed in the 100-member Senate to advance toward a final vote.

... The president was unable to overcome fierce opposition from fellow Republicans who said it was an amnesty for an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country and would do little to stem illegal immigration.

Even the promise of an additional $4.4 billion to pay for more border security and enforcement did not quell Republican opposition.

The bill failed to garner even a simple majority. Only 46 senators—33 Democrats, 12 Republicans and 1 independent—voted to advance the bill. Some 15 Democrats joined 37 Republicans and 1 independent to block the legislation.

It was the second time in as many weeks the Senate tried to pass the legislation.

Senate leaders have said it would be difficult if not impossible to revive the bill again before the November 2008 presidential election. Immigration has already become an issue in the election campaign.

Reuter’s top story today.

And then there was this:-

READ MORE...